原始網址:www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/06/160624135852.htm
What did Earth's ancient magnetic field look like?
地球古代磁場的樣貌為何?
New
work from Carnegie's Peter Driscoll suggests Earth's ancient magnetic
field was significantly different than the present day field,
originating from several poles rather than the familiar two. It is
published in Geophysical
Research Letters.
卡內基科學研究院的
Peter
Driscoll進行的新研究提出地球古代磁場跟現今磁場之間有相當大的差異。他認為過去的磁場是從數個磁極散發出來而非我們熟知的兩個。這項研究刊登於期刊《地球物理通訊》(Geophysical
Research Letters)之上。
Earth
generates a strong magnetic field extending from the core out into
space that shields the atmosphere and deflects harmful high-energy
particles from the Sun and the cosmos. Without it, our planet would
be bombarded by cosmic radiation, and life on Earth's surface might
not exist. The motion of liquid iron in Earth's outer core drives a
phenomenon called the geodynamo, which creates Earth's magnetic
field. This motion is driven by the loss of heat from the core and
the solidification of the inner core.
地球產生的強烈磁場會從地核延伸至太空,這道磁場不只能保護大氣層,還能偏折從宇宙和太陽散發出的有害高能粒子。沒有這道磁場,我們的星球會被宇宙輻射轟炸,地球上的生物也可能不復存在。地球外核液態鐵的流動會驅動所謂的「地球發電機」(geodynamo)現象而產生磁場,這種運動的能量來源為地核本身以及內核凝固時產生的熱。
But
the planet's inner core was not always solid. What effect did the
initial solidification of the inner core have on the magnetic field?
Figuring out when it happened and how the field responded has
created a particularly vexing and elusive problem for those trying
to understand our planet's geologic evolution, a problem that
Driscoll set out to resolve.
但是地球內核並非一直以來都是固態的。內核開始凝固時會對地磁產生什麼樣的效應?解開此現象何時發生以及對磁場的影響,對於想瞭解地球的地質活動是如何演變的科學家來說是道相當令人困惑且費解的難題,而Driscoll決心要解決這道謎題。
Here's
the issue: Scientists are able to reconstruct the planet's magnetic
record through analysis of ancient rocks that still bear a signature
of the magnetic polarity of the era in which they were formed. This
record suggests that the field has been active and dipolar--having
two poles--through much of our planet's history. The geological
record also doesn't show much evidence for major changes in the
intensity of the ancient magnetic field over the past 4 billion
years. A critical exception is in the Neoproterozoic Era, 0.5 to 1
billion years ago, where gaps in the intensity record and anomalous
directions exist. Could this exception be explained by a major event
like the solidification of the planet's inner core?
問題在此:有些古代岩石能保留它們形成年代時的磁極資訊,科學家經由分析它們可以重建地球磁場的相關紀錄。這些紀錄呈現出在地球歷史上大多時間地球磁場都相當活躍且具備雙極性(dipolar),意味著其具備兩個磁極。40億年來地質紀錄中也並未有太多證據指出過往地球磁場強度有相當大的變化。有一個重大例外出現在5億年至10億年前的新元古代(Neoproterozoic
Era),磁場強度的紀錄在此出現一段缺失,且磁場方向也變得相當異常。像是地球內核開始凝固這類的重大事件可以解釋這件例外嗎?
In
order to address this question, Driscoll modeled the planet's
thermal history going back 4.5 billion years. His models indicate
that the inner core should have begun to solidify around 650 million
years ago. Using further 3-D dynamo simulations, which model the
generation of magnetic field by turbulent fluid motions, Driscoll
looked more carefully at the expected changes in the magnetic field
over this period.
為了處理這個問題,Driscoll模擬45億年來地球熱能的歷史變化。他的模型指出內核應該是在大約6億5000萬年前開始凝固。Driscoll進一步運用3-D發電機模型來模擬由紊流液體運動產生的磁場,如此他可以更仔細地觀察磁場在這段期間伴隨產生的變化。
"What
I found was a surprising amount of variability," Driscoll said.
"These new models do not support the assumption of a stable
dipole field at all times, contrary to what we'd previously
believed."
「我發現這段期間的變化十分驚人。」Driscoll說。「跟我們原先認為的相反,新的模擬結果並不支持地磁總是雙極性的假說。」
His
results showed that around 1 billion years ago, Earth could have
transitioned from a modern-looking field, having a "strong"
magnetic field with two opposite poles in the north and south of the
planet, to having a "weak" magnetic field that fluctuated
wildly in terms of intensity and direction and originated from
several poles. Then, shortly after the predicted timing of the core
solidification event, Driscoll's dynamo simulations predict that
Earth's magnetic field transitioned back to a "strong,"
two-pole one.
他的結果顯示大約在10億年前,地球磁場從跟現今磁場十分相似,也就是磁場強度十分強且兩個磁極相對位於南北極,轉變成強度微弱的磁場,其強度和方向變動的十分劇烈,且源自於好幾個磁極。接著,在地核凝固事件推估發生的時間點不久之後,Driscoll的發電機模型預測地球磁場會再度變強且具備雙極性。
"These
findings could offer an explanation for the bizarre fluctuations in
magnetic field direction seen in the geologic record around 600 to
700 million years ago," Driscoll added. "And there are
widespread implications for such dramatic field changes."
「這項發現可以解釋約莫在6億至7億年前的地質紀錄中觀察到磁場方向出現難以理解的波動。」Driscoll補充。「磁場出現如此劇烈的變化還具有相當多的意涵。」
Overall,
the findings have major implications for Earth's thermal and
magnetic history, particularly when it comes to how magnetic
measurements are used to reconstruct continental motions and ancient
climates. Driscoll's modeling and simulations will have to be
compared with future data gleaned from high quality magnetized rocks
to assess the viability of the new hypothesis.
總結來說,這些發現對於地球熱學及地磁史來說都有相當重要的意義,對於經常用到地球磁場測量結果的陸塊運動重建以及古氣候研究來說更是如此。
Driscoll的模型和模擬結果未來勢必要跟從磁化品質相當良好的岩石中蒐集到的資料互相比較,才能評估這項新假說的可行性。
引用自:Carnegie
Institution for Science. "What did Earth's ancient magnetic
field look like?." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 24 June 2016.